Fire in California

I'm thinking a different delivery system - I'm thinking why the heck not a complete ocean-water delivery system with pumping stations near the coast pushing it to hydrants inland. Why send reservoir or potable water thru a fire suppression system when you live next to an endless supply?
Wouldn’t that also kill all the vegetation and prevent it from growing back?
 
From Trump on Truth social.
Governor Gavin Newscum refused to sign the water restoration declaration put before him that would have allowed millions of gallons of water, from excess rain and snow melt from the North, to flow daily into many parts of California, including the areas that are currently burning in a virtually apocalyptic way. He wanted to protect an essentially worthless fish called a smelt, by giving it less water (it didn’t work!), but didn’t care about the people of California. Now the ultimate price is being paid. I will demand that this incompetent governor allow beautiful, clean, fresh water to FLOW INTO CALIFORNIA! He is the blame for this. On top of it all, no water for fire hydrants, not firefighting planes. A true disaster!
 
You're not serious, right?
I am. PCH from the Santa Monica Pier to Ventura was part of my old stomping grounds when growing up.

The hose would have to cross the beach, PCH, possibly up a cliff just to get to the ocean side of the community. The hose would likely have to follow the steep winding roads to avoid the deep ravines and ridges that make up the terrain. The brush is on the inland side and that’s where the fires start. The hose would have to run through the community just to reach the fires. It’d be a long uphill battle to pump seawater to fight the fires.
 
I am. PCH from the Santa Monica Pier to Ventura was part of my old stomping grounds when growing up.

The hose would have to cross the beach, PCH, possibly up a cliff just to get to the ocean side of the community. The hose would likely have to follow the steep winding roads to avoid the deep ravines and ridges that make up the terrain. The brush is on the inland side and that’s where the fires start. The hose would have to run through the community just to reach the fires. It’d be a long uphill battle to pump seawater to fight the fires.

Are you Bob's cousin?!?

Good god - why TF would they string hoses that far?!? no - refer back to my post about having a fire suppression system set up using ocean water as the source
 
I'm thinking a different delivery system - I'm thinking why the heck not a complete ocean-water delivery system with pumping stations near the coast pushing it to hydrants inland. Why send reservoir or potable water thru a fire suppression system when you live next to an endless supply?
Ah yeah I see what you are saying. Cost would be the biggest issue I would assume. It would be two runs of piping everywhere but you would still need to pump it from the hydrant. Its not great for the hose or nozzle either I can't imagine. Where there is a will there is a way but in California, no will.
 
IDK - the planes are filling up with it. I wouldn't think this would be like salting fields. If they're gonna continue with living in a fire zone something would need to give
I’m with you.. with the billions this state spends on useless shit.. it wouldnt be that hard to put a better system in place. Kind of ironic that this is happening in one of the highly concentrated liberal areas that continues to Vote for these fucktards.
 
Wouldn’t that also kill all the vegetation and prevent it from growing back?
IDK - the planes are filling up with it. I wouldn't think this would be like salting fields. If they're gonna continue with living in a fire zone something would need to give
I would think the salt would be good for the lack of grass. It would still be in small enough doses that it would help I would be. I mean sea salt is good.

Also, I guessing you mean it WOULD be like salting pastures?
 
Ah yeah I see what you are saying. Cost would be the biggest issue I would assume. It would be two runs of piping everywhere but you would still need to pump it from the hydrant. Its not great for the hose or nozzle either I can't imagine. Where there is a will there is a way but in California, no will.
I’m with you.. with the billions this state spends on useless shit.. it wouldnt be that hard to put a better system in place. Kind of ironic that this is happening in one of the highly concentrated liberal areas that continues to Vote for these fucktards.

I googled and the ocean water would likely cause some damage to vegetation, but in a catastrophic situation like this you would have an endless supply of water to try and save the people at least.
 
I would think the salt would be good for the lack of grass. It would still be in small enough doses that it would help I would be. I mean sea salt is good.

Also, I guessing you mean it WOULD be like salting pastures?

I meant it wouldn't be like salting an enemies fields where nothing would grow for generations
 
I would think the salt would be good for the lack of grass. It would still be in small enough doses that it would help I would be. I mean sea salt is good.

Also, I guessing you mean it WOULD be like salting pastures?
Yeah I don’t know that’s why I asked. I use salt water to kill weeds in the driveway. Not as effective as Roundup but not as carcinogenic either.
 
Are you Bob's cousin?!?

Good god - why TF would they string hoses that far?!? no - refer back to my post about having a fire suppression system set up using ocean water as the source
Dude, chill. You asked about suction hoses. That lead me to believe it was a suggestion to solve the immediate problem. It wasn’t clear you were asking why they hadn’t built the system beforehand.
 
Dude, chill. You asked about suction hoses. That lead me to believe it was a suggestion to solve the immediate problem. It wasn’t clear you were asking why they hadn’t built the system beforehand.

Lol, I was being being facetious - I didn't mean literally stretching hundreds of fire hoses together to supply one fire truck with water

But an infrastructure sucking ocean water in a catastrophic fire situation seems better than having nothing at all to throw at it
 
Lol, I was being being facetious - I didn't mean literally stretching hundreds of fire hoses together to supply one fire truck with water

Ha! My wife had to have a talk with me just yesterday. I’ve been so focused on regearing my Jeep, I’ve tuned out everything else- eating, sleeping, communicating with more than grunts, playing with Minerva and Belle, cleaning the litterbox, tying my shoes, humor-

But an infrastructure sucking ocean water in a catastrophic fire situation seems better than having nothing at all to throw at it
Yes. Yes, it is. During the 60s & 70s my father fought a lot of Californian wildfires as a volunteer fireman. Wildfires and Santana Winds are a terrifying combination.
 
Why don't they do controlled burns to get rid of the underbrush & easy fuel for these fires? Is that even a possibility?
Controlled burns don't further the climate change agenda. They intentionally leave these areas unmanaged for decades so shit like this has to happen. Now all of the owners of those burnt Teslas are going to go "See! Climate change is real! Ban gas cars...".
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom