Well I've been doing some minor rethinking of my parts selection, trying to ensure compatibility with the largest amount of Jeep rigs as possible. My near complete solution runs on the ragged edge of the biggest rotor and caliper that I can squeeze in a wheel, however, I've found a solution that may be a slight reduction in rotor size, but ensure way more compatibility for everyone out there. This gets complicated, but it has to do with clearances with the inner rim bead, the rim spokes, potential stick-on wheel weights used on the inside of the rim, the tie rod mounting tab on the steering knuckle...and on and on and on...
-- I also have been doing extensive research and testing regarding caliper stiffness. And there are some AMAZING results regarding this.... I even have a video of the stock caliper on my jeep, with the camera mounted in the wheel well, showing the massive flexing open the caliper does when you stomp the brakes like in an emergency stop... it is mind boggling and explains so many of the limitations of a stock system...
-- Brake pad compounds have also been researched. And I will give you guys a heads up on this: the pads I will ultimately recommend are going to produce a fair amount of dust. No they aren't ceramic. Yep, you will likely replace them every 30k or so. Why? Because you will pick up 30-40% in pad bite. A 30% increase in pad to rotor friction is worth
more than the theoretical brake torque gained from increasing from a 12" to a 15" rotor!!! That's massive!! Let me restate that: you can get as much benefit from a pad with a 30% increase in coefficient of friction as increasing your rotor diameter from 12 to 15 inches!! The main reason that alot of brakes aren't marketed this way is because Joe Public complains about brake dust and pad replacement more than they complain about crummy brakes. And it's worth it. So I'm warning in advance - no whining about dust.
If you are worried about dust on your wheels, or demand 90k miles between pad changes, you don't need this upgrade... or at least will not ever utillize its full potential anyway.
So... you all know by now that this huge-ass long thread has basically been an active look into my thought process. And, I guess, the thought processes of any company that has tried to put out a better JK brake package. I've identified so, so many of the constraints that we must work within to build a brake package:
-- wheel size
-- knuckle mount tab location
-- limited rotor offset (more offset will hit the tie rod mount)
-- fixed (or nearly) master cylinder bore... (not enough space under that cramped hood for a bigger off the shelf master cylinder)
-- ... which limits caliper piston bore surface area choice...
-- insufficient room under the hood for a simple hydroboost setup
-- rear rotor choice that allows stock parking brake use
-- narrow range of front/rear brake bias allowable to avoid rear wheel lockup
... I could go on for days. But this is what I've been up against. Just FYI.
SO... I may be incorporating a slightly smaller rotor to allow for a much larger percentage of Jeep guys and gals to bolt this on their rigs without issues. However, it looks like the stiffness I gain with a correct caliper choice AND a massive friction increase with proper pad choice will make the system perform way better than the original rotor size I proposed.
I hope I haven't bored anyone. And, well, if I did, there's plenty of other things to read on the internet! :bleh: But for those still following... I hope we are learning together!