Yes to the non Rubi question. The brakes on the Dana 30 are the same, thus the same mounting hole locations on the knuckle, and that's all that really matters for this swap.
As far as your ESP question: yes, there should not be any issues. The calculations and caliper selection I have done will allow factory master cylinder use. I also have a bolt in MC option from a late model Dodge Nitro that is exactly the same MC as the JK but with a tiny bore increase. That will give a firmer pedal but one that requires a touch more force from your leg to reach peak braking. It really will be personal preference on that issue.
The caliper piston surface areas, though there are four now in each caliper, are quite similar to the single large piston in the factory caliper. So no significant increase in fluid flow is needed. The braking increase comes from the massively larger rotor, the more even application of force from four smaller pistons, and brake pads with a much higher coefficient of friction. So, the ESP won't know the difference.
It should be noted that when I started this project I was really fixated on big caliper piston surface areas. The problem with that is that I couldn't find a master cylinder with a big enough bore to push enough fluid to make them work. I had the opportunity to drive a jeep locally with a company's popular big brake upgrade. It uses a caliper from Dodge Ram 1500 pickups. This JK had the upgraded master cylinder and I felt the brakes took too much travel of the pedal to achieve the 'improved braking'. When I did the calculations, it became evident why. Those big truck calipers need a lot of fluid behind those twin pistons. That means a huge master cylinder bore of 1.25" or bigger, OR a long stroke of the master with a brake pedal ratio adjusted to allow that without your foot having to move 18". A pickup truck has room under the hood for either, and there is also tons of space under the dash for a long brake pedal lever. Our Jeeps have exactly the opposite, unfortunately. In fact, the MC in a JK is nearly the shortest on the market for any vehicle due to the space constraints under the hood. And nobody makes a midget master cylinder with a huge bore
. Trust me... I looked...even at custom brake system fabricators.
Not to say that that JK I drove with the popular brake upgrade didn't work a bit better than stock, and I am so appreciative of all companies that try to improve the performance of our rigs. (Most companies that have done this have been able to produce a bolt-on installation, and there is benefit in that! I have already had to perform a mod to the knuckles that now makes it slightly less than bolt on.) It's just a pedal feel and travel I didn't personally enjoy, and the reason is clear in the numbers. So, I had to improve all the other aspects I mentioned. I CAN use a stiffer, more efficient fixed caliper. I CAN use much better biting pads (who cares about dust in this application). I CAN use a HuGE rotor! (Which gives us 20% more brake torque even if I changed nothing else and used the stock caliper!). So I identified the factors that affect raw brake torque, found which ones I could control, and found one, the MC size, that severely limited me. In my opinion, and I am by no means an expert, any brake system upgrade that attempts to use a big bore surface area caliper on the JK, without a matching significant MC upgrade (which simply won't fit in a JK), will never be able to reach ideal performance. The numbers show it. I hope my project provides the results I aim for, and I promise to be honest with everyone here. If it doesn't work ALOT better than stock, I will tell you.
Hope I kept your attention
Sent from my Nexus 7 using WAYALIFE mobile app