:cheesy: Good morning to you too.
Funny, I don't ever recall say that the Savvy's rig didn't run well or that their springs and shocks didn't work just fine. :naw:
Funny, I don't recall saying that either - just pointed out that they still came in 2nd. But, now that you mention it, I do think that a "huge advantage" is a stretch as John Currie was still able to come in within 8 minutes of them. The next closet competitor was about a half hour away. But hey, I'm the kind of guy who thinks a good driver can do more with less but, that's just me.
It's good to see you are at least consistent about making assumptions and acting on them rather using personal experience and facts. :thumb:
No, you just said and I quote, "Don't really see the need for coilovers seeing how the winner of EMC 2 years running has standard coils and shocks." And really, if that's what you believe, that's what you should run on your rig :yup:
:cheesy: You keep telling yourself that :thumb:
:yawn37: You'll forgive me but, I don't ever recall saying that Savvy didn't build a better car. Clearly, they DID as theirs held together and won the race. :naw:
Oh, I see, now you were just "interested in why he was running coil overs in a stock class. That was it." I could have sworn you just came on here to ask a loaded question and do it so that you could tell everyone how you don't really see the need for coilovers seeing how the winner of EMC 2 years running has standard coils and shocks. My mistake :rolleyes2:
Peace brother - have a nice day
Whatever man. I don't even know why I bother LOL.