DWiggles
Caught the Bug
I guess he had to change his avatar before he left..
NSFW lmao :thumb:
I guess he had to change his avatar before he left..
I started with the game changer kit and figured I would give an update. I've been through two sets of 6pak shocks. They are nice but require more frequent inspection for loss of nitrogen. The travel figures are accurate, but the increase in travel is in unusable compression. I say unusable because a 37" tire hits the fender well before bottoming out the shock. I'm now running Rancho 9000 with 3" bumpstops and max out the shock using all but 1/4" before compressing the bumps metal to metal. Ironically, I have more useable travel because the ranchos compress the same due to physical limits of tire to fender but have a longer overall length. When I ran the 6 pak shocks, I used longer heim jointed ends to gain more useable droop travel. However the complexity of the shocks became an issue eventually. I am happy with the arms and brake lines, which is all I have left from the original kit. Springs changed to 4" Evo Plush with same overall length as the dual rate coils, so no issues unseating coils. Trackbars were replaced due to bushings walking out of the mounts. Metalcloak offered to sell me new updated ones. Thanks a lot. Went back to stock front trackbar with Evo drag link flip. With the additional droop travel, the stock drag link would bind a bit.
Metalcloak game changer is nice but for my needs, only the arms were of use in the end. For the type of maintenance required for the performance gains of the 6pak shocks, I think the $$$$ would be better spent on a set of bolt on coilovers.
Just my :twocents:
I started with the game changer kit and figured I would give an update. I've been through two sets of 6pak shocks. They are nice but require more frequent inspection for loss of nitrogen. The travel figures are accurate, but the increase in travel is in unusable compression. I say unusable because a 37" tire hits the fender well before bottoming out the shock. I'm now running Rancho 9000 with 3" bumpstops and max out the shock using all but 1/4" before compressing the bumps metal to metal. Ironically, I have more useable travel because the ranchos compress the same due to physical limits of tire to fender but have a longer overall length. When I ran the 6 pak shocks, I used longer heim jointed ends to gain more useable droop travel. However the complexity of the shocks became an issue eventually. I am happy with the arms and brake lines, which is all I have left from the original kit. Springs changed to 4" Evo Plush with same overall length as the dual rate coils, so no issues unseating coils. Trackbars were replaced due to bushings walking out of the mounts. Metalcloak offered to sell me new updated ones. Thanks a lot. Went back to stock front trackbar with Evo drag link flip. With the additional droop travel, the stock drag link would bind a bit.
Metalcloak game changer is nice but for my needs, only the arms were of use in the end. For the type of maintenance required for the performance gains of the 6pak shocks, I think the $$$$ would be better spent on a set of bolt on coilovers.
Just my :twocents:
The real ones aroundWhy not be astronauts, or surgeons, or some other "well respected discipline" that isn't so OBVIOUSLY falsified by violating the Engineering Code of Ethics?
Im an astronaut.
I run an astronaut training academy.
Im an astronaut.
I run an astronaut training academy.
How is the wheelin' in space?
I sold $1.4 million worth of chips on Craigslist last year
I LIKE TURTLES :drool:
I started with the game changer kit and figured I would give an update. I've been through two sets of 6pak shocks. They are nice but require more frequent inspection for loss of nitrogen. The travel figures are accurate, but the increase in travel is in unusable compression. I say unusable because a 37" tire hits the fender well before bottoming out the shock. I'm now running Rancho 9000 with 3" bumpstops and max out the shock using all but 1/4" before compressing the bumps metal to metal. Ironically, I have more useable travel because the ranchos compress the same due to physical limits of tire to fender but have a longer overall length. When I ran the 6 pak shocks, I used longer heim jointed ends to gain more useable droop travel. However the complexity of the shocks became an issue eventually. I am happy with the arms and brake lines, which is all I have left from the original kit. Springs changed to 4" Evo Plush with same overall length as the dual rate coils, so no issues unseating coils. Trackbars were replaced due to bushings walking out of the mounts. Metalcloak offered to sell me new updated ones. Thanks a lot. Went back to stock front trackbar with Evo drag link flip. With the additional droop travel, the stock drag link would bind a bit.
Metalcloak game changer is nice but for my needs, only the arms were of use in the end. For the type of maintenance required for the performance gains of the 6pak shocks, I think the $$$$ would be better spent on a set of bolt on coilovers.
Just my :twocents:
How is the wheelin' in space?
Sweet! :thumbs:
Two sets (8) shocks - what was the problem with them? How much backspace do you run and what fenders do you have?
As far as the down travel goes, on my setup the after market driveshaft hits the cross member at droop. Had some issues with 4.5 " backspace, spacers fixed that until I get some beadlocks.
2" bumpstops with 37 KO2 (yes they are undersized). With MC fenders I could get by with 1 ". I have some friends with the six pack with MC fenders with true 37 running 1". Every rig is a little different.
If I had to do it over I would have gone with the MC fenders instead of PSC.
. . . . . . . . . .
One set of shocks locked up. Metalcloak replaced them under warranty with a newer set with updated seals. No explanation was provided for why they locked up. The second set became inconsistent from one shock to another.
I'm running 3.5" backspace ATX Slabs with 37" Toyos (13.5" wide) with Genright flat fenders. I'm running Evo 4" coils instead of the Metalcloak dual rate so I am running 3" bumpstop. 2" bump and wider track width allowed too much rubbing on the fenders at full compression when articulating. My crossmember is still there; however, the small skid that runs in front of the crossmember was removed. No issues.
I started with the game changer kit and figured I would give an update. I've been through two sets of 6pak shocks. They are nice but require more frequent inspection for loss of nitrogen. The travel figures are accurate, but the increase in travel is in unusable compression. I say unusable because a 37" tire hits the fender well before bottoming out the shock. I'm now running Rancho 9000 with 3" bumpstops and max out the shock using all but 1/4" before compressing the bumps metal to metal. Ironically, I have more useable travel because the ranchos compress the same due to physical limits of tire to fender but have a longer overall length. When I ran the 6 pak shocks, I used longer heim jointed ends to gain more useable droop travel. However the complexity of the shocks became an issue eventually. I am happy with the arms and brake lines, which is all I have left from the original kit. Springs changed to 4" Evo Plush with same overall length as the dual rate coils, so no issues unseating coils. Trackbars were replaced due to bushings walking out of the mounts. Metalcloak offered to sell me new updated ones. Thanks a lot. Went back to stock front trackbar with Evo drag link flip. With the additional droop travel, the stock drag link would bind a bit.
Metalcloak game changer is nice but for my needs, only the arms were of use in the end. For the type of maintenance required for the performance gains of the 6pak shocks, I think the $$$$ would be better spent on a set of bolt on coilovers.
Just my :twocents:
May I ask why you switched out the springs? The metalcloak kit is on my short list of lifts I'm interested in. I total agree with what I've herd here about the 6 pack shocks not being worth the money. I've talked to a handful of guy who have run metalcloak and most all have given good feedback on the arms & springs though. I was considering running their kit with conventional shocks but if their springs aren't desirable either it looks like I can shorten the list.
Can u tell me what u didn't like about their springs or what u like about the Evo springs better?