daltexjeeper
New member
I didn't get the numbers but here's what he told me ;
"Departure angle is affected but not by much. If you think you will never use the cans go can-less. If you want cans even someday go Rotopax."
So I guess departure angle on the rotopax is nothing to be worried about !
I am in the exact same boat as you. Torn between the two carriers. Here is an image I found which shows a tape measure of the rotopax version: http://www.jk-forum.com/sponsoring-...orum-24/fab-rotopax-carrier-pre-order-176556/
Based on the thickness of the Rotopax container itself, I would say the non-can version would probably sit about 3.5 - 4" closer to the body. Having the ability to carrier fuel or water may be worth it, but I'm still not sure I would ever use them.