jeep-creep
New member
Real life abuse and technical difference between the two?
TLAW719 said:If you can afford it I think it would be best to go with a PR60 up front and a PR60 full float rear. even if you are running 37's. IMHO it's better to have it and not need it then need it and not have it. breaks can get expensive so if you can limit the breaks why not. its expensive up front but could save you money in the long run.
The difference is in how it's built. The Trail Series housing isn't profiled for maximum clearance and the tubes used are not as thick as a ProRock. Also, I believe it's only available as a semi-float but, I could be wrong on this.
Thanks for the info. After looking on northridges web sight it's only 400$ difference. I know this has been gone over and over. But with 37's and a heavier 4 door would the pr44 hold up. My big thing is the width of the 60 living in the east tiring to fit between the trees. Also with 37's should I go with the full float.
I really don't understand the difference other than it sound stronger
Just found out a little info that I thought I would share. If you go with the cut down 60 in the back you can't get the full float. Like wol and dynatrac said for 37's I should be good. For the front I'm going to go with pr44 and use my built up parts from my stock 44 and use the stock locker. I'm going to get arb in the back. Is it going to be a problem with the switch on the front. I would assume I would have to push it twice to engage the front.
I think he may be talking about the trail version
I talked to dynatrac yesterday and they said if I get it cut down to match the 44 my only option was the semi float and I could get it in the trail series or upgrade to the pro rock.
Sorry for the terminology. I mean the width is shorter to match the pr44. I hope that is clearer. Does this not sound right.
Sorry for the terminology. I mean the width is shorter to match the pr44. I hope that is clearer. Does this not sound right.