GCM 2
New member
.....I will be filing an official Form 45-69-4512B with the US Department of Non-Lame Jeep Photos within the week, I'll shut this muther F'r down!!!:synister:
Sir, we certainly appreciate any and all comments related to photos inlcuded within the Nothing but Malls and Parking Lots thread. However, I provided a boring photo as required by the original post so as to not be in tviolation of the original statues and mall by laws-
s. 318.18. Any person who fails to comply with any provision of this chapter for which a penalty is not otherwise provided commits a nonmoving parking lot violation deemed non-lame, is punishable as provided if a person who is cited for a violation of s. 316.646 can show illegitimate proof of non-lameness as required by s. 627.733, issued to the person and valid at the time of said non-lameness, the clerk of the court may dismiss the case and may assess a dismissal fee of up to $10. A person who finds it impossible or impractical to obtain proof of non-lameness must submit an affidavit detailing the reasons for the impracticality. The reasons may include, but are not limited to, the fact that the vehicle has since been sold, stolen, destroyed, borrowed by a cousin, used as a prop for a B movie, or simply misplaced; that the owner or registrant of the vehicle is not required by s. 627.733 to maintain personal non-lameness photo protection insurance; or that the vehicle is owned by another non-lame person.
Thank you for your time and sincerity to discredit what was definitely a lame event for EVOJEEP, it has been logged into the JPIMPC club 3rd quarter meeting minutes for posterity and future training of human resources and janitorial staff.