I liked my 5100s and still have them but decided to try the Rancho 9000s this time. I like the Ranchos overall...compliant on pavement and decent damping. The finish is cheap (on the 9000s anyway) and they had surface rust (on top) brand new. I think the 5100s are more controlled with better damping and a bit firmer overall. I plan on running the Ranchos for another month or two and then swapping to compare back-to-back. I run 35" MTRs at around 28 PSI.
:thinking::thinking::thinking: Comparable but yours suck?? I have to disagree shocks are different and you most often get what you pay for! ride is subjective and only each person can pick the right one for them! Drive someones rig and see if you like it best thing i can tell ya!
Hey guys,
wondering what your opinions are on shocks. it seems that bilsteins are the most commonly used shocks around here, and they come at a great price. However i was wondering how they compare to fox shocks that are around the same price like the 2.0 evolution (92 bucks/shock) or the smooth body IFP (120/shock). Im asking because from my other hobbies (i mountain bike a lot) fox is pretty much top of the line, is there a difference in how they feel or how they perform? whats your $.02?
thanks
Otzy
Both brands are good for shock absorbers. You can take any one of them without any hesitation. If you want to choose any one of them, it depends on your use and budget. If you wish to shocks for regular use, then you can take Bilstein 5100. Fox 2.0 shocks are giving you a better off-road performance.
Thank God that you got here and replied. The OP along with the rest of us have been keeping an eye on this thread for over 6 years just waiting for our cyber messiah to show up and grant us words of wisdom.