What gears are you running? 3.21, 3.73, or 4.10? If you're running the first two, I'd keep the tires and give them a chance. I'm running 3.73s and 285/70R17s and love the combination but I tend to drive 4, 5, 600 miles to where I like to wheel or more and spend a lot of time on the highway getting there. I also like to go to areas with higher altitudes and with that comes long up hill grades. I'm finding that my transmission is running well with these and I am not seeing a re-gear needed right now. Down the road, should I find I want/need to go bigger I am sure that a re-gear will go concurrently with the re-tire, just to keep my performance where it is. I find that with my tire size I am still within the "sweet spot" of my power band and gearing but that's me. Personally, I think 295/70R17 is the sweet spot of tire sizes for the JK for the widest possibility of applications (here comes the 32, 33, 35, and 37 mafias with why those sizes are best......) but hear me out. 35" appears to be the size were the leverage of the height and diameter begin to have impact on premature wear of components. Bending axle flanges, early clutch failure, bearings, joints, etc. and on and on, based on the anecdotal evidence of posters and their experiences with the larger sizes. Go bigger than 35 and those wear issues seem to grow exponentially. at 295 your an inch under 315 (35"). Seems like a good place to be to me. Not so large that you're breaking things with tire size yet big enough for obstacle clearance, within the performance envelope of stock gearing. You're essentially getting the benefits of 35"s without the baggage that the size can bring. I'd suggest you run them and see, do you need better gearing? Are they working? You just might find that you chose better with the 295s than you realize.
What gears are you running? 3.21, 3.73, or 4.10? If you're running the first two, I'd keep the tires and give them a chance. I'm running 3.73s and 285/70R17s and love the combination but I tend to drive 4, 5, 600 miles to where I like to wheel or more and spend a lot of time on the highway getting there. I also like to go to areas with higher altitudes and with that comes long up hill grades. I'm finding that my transmission is running well with these and I am not seeing a re-gear needed right now. Down the road, should I find I want/need to go bigger I am sure that a re-gear will go concurrently with the re-tire, just to keep my performance where it is. I find that with my tire size I am still within the "sweet spot" of my power band and gearing but that's me. Personally, I think 295/70R17 is the sweet spot of tire sizes for the JK for the widest possibility of applications (here comes the 32, 33, 35, and 37 mafias with why those sizes are best......) but hear me out. 35" appears to be the size were the leverage of the height and diameter begin to have impact on premature wear of components. Bending axle flanges, early clutch failure, bearings, joints, etc. and on and on, based on the anecdotal evidence of posters and their experiences with the larger sizes. Go bigger than 35 and those wear issues seem to grow exponentially. at 295 your an inch under 315 (35"). Seems like a good place to be to me. Not so large that you're breaking things with tire size yet big enough for obstacle clearance, within the performance envelope of stock gearing. You're essentially getting the benefits of 35"s without the baggage that the size can bring. I'd suggest you run them and see, do you need better gearing? Are they working? You just might find that you chose better with the 295s than you realize.
I've been eyeing that size of tire myself. Are they not considered a 34"? Just not ready at the moment. GLWS.
I like my 295/70-17's, perfect combo with the 6 speed and 3.73 gears. My boss has 315/70/17's on his jeep and they really aren't much bigger. We both had a 2" lift when I took this pic mine is the anvil.View attachment 127343
Price drop.... $950. I dont mind to drive a little bit to meet somebody in the middle.
Wanna drive to Nevada for an extra $20?
:brows: