boardsurfer
Active Member
I generally take today's main stream media with a skepticism first kind of viewpoint. You know, the whole "sources said" or " sources familiar with.." bullshit. Unless someone will own the claim, its bullshit to me.
However..
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jun/06/whistleblower-ufo-alien-tech-spacecraft
This article at The Guardian appears to be a rare occurance of actual journalism with named sources, corroborating quotes, and high level officials on the record.
A few quotes:
and if that isnt clear enough:
Absolutely insane. What do you think?
However..
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jun/06/whistleblower-ufo-alien-tech-spacecraft
This article at The Guardian appears to be a rare occurance of actual journalism with named sources, corroborating quotes, and high level officials on the record.
A few quotes:
Former intelligence official David Grusch, who led analysis of unexplained anomalous phenomena (UAP) within a US Department of Defense agency, has alleged that the US has craft of non-human origin.
Jonathan Grey, a current US intelligence official at the National Air and Space Intelligence Center (Nasic), confirmed the existence of “exotic materials” to the Debrief, adding: “We are not alone.”
and if that isnt clear enough:
“We are not talking about prosaic origins or identities,” Grusch said. “The material includes intact and partially intact vehicles.”
Absolutely insane. What do you think?