NPC 6060⁸42
Hooked
You are a brave one ain’t you?I’ll see your Latina and raise you with a Redhead
You are a brave one ain’t you?I’ll see your Latina and raise you with a Redhead
My wife knows about my ex
sarcasm flew overhead and missed lolSame
I'm smarter than to marry one that can read.........Some of you guys are in trouble if your wife reads this forum
Trust me, I caught the sarcasm. However, I figured I’d better hedge my bets just in case I walk away from the computer with this forum on the screensarcasm flew overhead and missed lol
I was young, foolish and ignorant of the hot/ crazy paradigmYou are a brave one ain’t you?
The FCU of the P365 and P320 are completely different from each other. The P365 had its own set of teething problems and firing when dropped was never one of them
My black powder experience was closed devices in the arizona desert. Big bang. You should totally do it.Anyone have much experience with black powder? I'm thinking of getting into a Colt Walker replica (or a pair...). Is there any reason why it might be a bad idea to start my black powder journey there? Thanks!
The FCU of the P365 and P320 are completely different from each other. The P365 had its own set of teething problems and firing when dropped was never one of them
The text of the second amendment does not address whether arms can be concealed. If arms are not allowed to be concealed, then open carry must be allowed. It may be implied that the nature of arms carried, or where they may be carried, can not be limited due to "shall not be infringed" but it seems that this is a matter of much debate. Clearly it must be possible to carry arms capable of significant deady force (sufficient to help defend the state in times of crisis) in order to meet one of the stated intents of the amendment. This means that at least semi-automatic arms must be allowed, but if an opposing force has full-automatic (extremely likely), then surely at least the equivalent should be allowed. If citizens are called to defend the nation then we should expect them to have access to the best arms available.
sheepThe text of the second amendment does not address whether arms can be concealed. If arms are not allowed to be concealed, then open carry must be allowed. It may be implied that the nature of arms carried, or where they may be carried, can not be limited due to "shall not be infringed" but it seems that this is a matter of much debate. Clearly it must be possible to carry arms capable of significant deady force (sufficient to help defend the state in times of crisis) in order to meet one of the stated intents of the amendment. This means that at least semi-automatic arms must be allowed, but if an opposing force has full-automatic (extremely likely), then surely at least the equivalent should be allowed. If citizens are called to defend the nation then we should expect them to have access to the best arms available.
How do Colorado and other left-leaning states get away with this?