Show Off Your Guns!

Anyone have much experience with black powder? I'm thinking of getting into a Colt Walker replica (or a pair...). Is there any reason why it might be a bad idea to start my black powder journey there? Thanks!
 
Anyone have much experience with black powder? I'm thinking of getting into a Colt Walker replica (or a pair...). Is there any reason why it might be a bad idea to start my black powder journey there? Thanks!
My black powder experience was closed devices in the arizona desert. Big bang. You should totally do it.
 
Even their state Constitution:

View attachment 422706
The text of the second amendment does not address whether arms can be concealed. If arms are not allowed to be concealed, then open carry must be allowed. It may be implied that the nature of arms carried, or where they may be carried, can not be limited due to "shall not be infringed" but it seems that this is a matter of much debate. Clearly it must be possible to carry arms capable of significant deady force (sufficient to help defend the state in times of crisis) in order to meet one of the stated intents of the amendment. This means that at least semi-automatic arms must be allowed, but if an opposing force has full-automatic (extremely likely), then surely at least the equivalent should be allowed. If citizens are called to defend the nation then we should expect them to have access to the best arms available.

How do Colorado and other left-leaning states get away with this?
 
The text of the second amendment does not address whether arms can be concealed. If arms are not allowed to be concealed, then open carry must be allowed. It may be implied that the nature of arms carried, or where they may be carried, can not be limited due to "shall not be infringed" but it seems that this is a matter of much debate. Clearly it must be possible to carry arms capable of significant deady force (sufficient to help defend the state in times of crisis) in order to meet one of the stated intents of the amendment. This means that at least semi-automatic arms must be allowed, but if an opposing force has full-automatic (extremely likely), then surely at least the equivalent should be allowed. If citizens are called to defend the nation then we should expect them to have access to the best arms available.

How do Colorado and other left-leaning states get away with this?
sheep
 
Top Bottom