I know you all have to be tired of all the repetitive threads about lifting on a budget. After reading through countless of these threads covering the same thing over and over my mind has gone to plaid so please pay no attention to the slack-jawed look on my face. :icon_crazy:
So what I have is the beginnings of a cobbled together setup with a few questions. First the setup and a bit of reasoning, though it could just be gas.
The contender - 2015 Rubicon Unlimited Hard Rock - Juice
RC 2.5" Series II - 634 - this looks like a pure spacer lift with shock relocation for stock shocks. This won't be Juice's one and only lift though budgeting is tight for the next several years at least. At just under $200 (less shocks), this option fits the budget. I won't be using their spring lift option as I don't see many positive reviews of their springs & shocks.
Some numbers I've found for shock dimensions. Hopefully these are close enough to not present any serious issues.
Stock front rubi shock - Comp length 14.75 - Ext length 22.75
Rancho RS999326 - Comp length 13.938 - Ext length 21.78
Rancho RS999329 - Comp length 15.660 - Ext length 25.28
Stock rear rubi shock - Comp length 14.63 - Ext length 23.13
Rancho RS999330 - Comp length 16.110 - Ext length 26.02
Rancho RS999332 - Comp length 16.813 - Ext length 27.19
I can run the stock rubi shocks with the relocation hardware for awhile but do plan on upgrading to the RS9000XL's at some point in the not too distant future. Question is which length to go with for this lift? I see that the Rancho 2" Sport kit RS66109BR9 is built around the RS999326 and the RS999330. That RS999326 actually shaves about an inch off the shock length with 2" of lift but allows for about 3/4" more compression up front. I don't see that the kit comes with any shock relocation. This doesn't make sense to me but I am most likely missing something important. The RS999330 in the rear does seem to be proportionally sized for 2" of lift and stock shock location. Not sure why the discrepancy. I am considering this kit as an alternate to the RC 2.5 also. Anybody with experience with this lift? Does it have shock relocation?
So I had it in my mind that the RS999329 coupled with the RC's 2.5 inches of lift w/o shock relocation brackets should work well. Am I high or just plain wrong? :thinking: Sticking to the RS999330's in the rear would seem to make sense with this kit as well. Anybody running the RC 2.5 Series II with the RS9000XL's? What size? Good/bad results? Too much droop up front for the stock drive shaft?
Your opinions would be greatly appreciated!
So what I have is the beginnings of a cobbled together setup with a few questions. First the setup and a bit of reasoning, though it could just be gas.
The contender - 2015 Rubicon Unlimited Hard Rock - Juice
RC 2.5" Series II - 634 - this looks like a pure spacer lift with shock relocation for stock shocks. This won't be Juice's one and only lift though budgeting is tight for the next several years at least. At just under $200 (less shocks), this option fits the budget. I won't be using their spring lift option as I don't see many positive reviews of their springs & shocks.
Some numbers I've found for shock dimensions. Hopefully these are close enough to not present any serious issues.
Stock front rubi shock - Comp length 14.75 - Ext length 22.75
Rancho RS999326 - Comp length 13.938 - Ext length 21.78
Rancho RS999329 - Comp length 15.660 - Ext length 25.28
Stock rear rubi shock - Comp length 14.63 - Ext length 23.13
Rancho RS999330 - Comp length 16.110 - Ext length 26.02
Rancho RS999332 - Comp length 16.813 - Ext length 27.19
I can run the stock rubi shocks with the relocation hardware for awhile but do plan on upgrading to the RS9000XL's at some point in the not too distant future. Question is which length to go with for this lift? I see that the Rancho 2" Sport kit RS66109BR9 is built around the RS999326 and the RS999330. That RS999326 actually shaves about an inch off the shock length with 2" of lift but allows for about 3/4" more compression up front. I don't see that the kit comes with any shock relocation. This doesn't make sense to me but I am most likely missing something important. The RS999330 in the rear does seem to be proportionally sized for 2" of lift and stock shock location. Not sure why the discrepancy. I am considering this kit as an alternate to the RC 2.5 also. Anybody with experience with this lift? Does it have shock relocation?
So I had it in my mind that the RS999329 coupled with the RC's 2.5 inches of lift w/o shock relocation brackets should work well. Am I high or just plain wrong? :thinking: Sticking to the RS999330's in the rear would seem to make sense with this kit as well. Anybody running the RC 2.5 Series II with the RS9000XL's? What size? Good/bad results? Too much droop up front for the stock drive shaft?
Your opinions would be greatly appreciated!