Search results

No. It’s a sig threaded barrel.

Would you? Or would you say it was all AI generated? I guess only time will tell. One way or another, it will be fun to come back to this thread to see how it aged. By then we could all be driving electric Jeep JZ’s.

The flux platform has a thumb safety built in. The trigger can’t move.

So this thing is insanely fun and crazy accurate for what it is. My boys were pinging a torso plate at 60 and 100 yards with no support.

What “proof” would it take for you to believe that the landing happened? If you were able to look through a telescope with your owns eyes and see footprints, or remnants of the mission, would you then believe that it happened? What happens when someone lands on the moon again in the next 30...

Right, because 2D photos of 3D situations never create a vanishing point for parallel lines or do weird things with shadows, especially with wide angle lenses.

You still haven’t answered my question about the laser ranging panels and how they got there. Who said we don’t have the technology to go? Here are a few more things that support the landing. 1. Physical evidence returned to Earth • 842 pounds of Moon rocks were brought back by...

I’d state it differently. The basic theme is that people believe what they want to believe based on the amount of “evidence” they find acceptable to reinforce the narrative that makes them feel good. Most of the time it only takes a question or two to uncover a person’s intellectual hypocrisies...

And then on Sundays, they teach them that Adam and Eve were the first two humans, that people have been around for only 6,000 or so years, and that some dude with a funny name was able to part an entire sea (all of which is far more believable than a moon landing). ;)

Happy New Year!

Congrats!

Bullshit! That can’t be true. It’s an impenetrable force field that will kill you instantly!

And exactly how much radiation would they have experienced passing through the belt? I’ve read it was about the same as a chest X-ray. I’ve had several of those and am still alive and kicking. At some point in life you have to weigh the evidence presented and come to your own conclusions...

Oh, I’ve read those threads. They are fun for sure.

If you have ever used a range finder to hunt (or play golf), I don’t understand how you reject the moon landing. The laser refracting panels didn’t get thrown onto the moon (same basic technology used in hunting and golfing) and scientists across the world have been ranging against them ever...

Fake moon landing? JFC!

I doubt many regular Joe’s can afford to buy something in NYC. Ironically, your question is actually why the liberals think a law like this is a good idea. It is supposed to give non profit organizations the ability to buy properties and then sell them to regular Joe’s at below market value.

And that would be a taking in violation of the 5th Amendment to the Constitution, especially if the property was given to a NGO. Eminent domain law is pretty well-established and NYC is already pushing close to the edge.

Maybe I’m missing something, but COPA doesn’t force a property seller to sell for less than market value. The nonprofit gets a right of first refusal but it has to beat all other offers. So, the seller isn’t getting screwed out of money. While I don’t agree with such a law, at least it isn’t...

Merry Christmas fuckers.