jeeeep
Hooked
Well, to be fair, every picture and map I've seen of the Earth, it's very flat
Rabbit Holes š
- Thread starter Ddays
- Start date
OverlanderJK
Resident Smartass
My question, yet we donāt have the technology to go there today. The government never lies to us. The radiation from the Van Allen belt is safe and effective.
OverlanderJK
Resident Smartass
Nothing to see here.
WJCO
Meme King
There's a couple of documentaries out there that go into even way more with other photos. Especially the ones where the camera crosshairs are behind objects when they should be in front of objects. It's pretty hard to look at that kind of evidence and put full trust in the official story.
Sharkey
Word Ninja
You still havenāt answered my question about the laser ranging panels and how they got there.
Who said we donāt have the technology to go?
Here are a few more things that support the landing.
1. Physical evidence returned to Earth
ā¢ 842 pounds of Moon rocks were brought back by Apollo missions.
ā¢ These rocks are chemically and isotopically distinct from Earth rocks and from meteorites.
ā¢ Scientists worldwide (including in countries adversarial to the U.S.) have studied them for decades and agree they are lunar in origin.
2. Independent verification by other countries
ā¢ The Soviet Union, which was competing with the U.S. in the Space Race, tracked Apollo missions in real time and never disputed the landings.
ā¢ Modern spacecraft from Japan, India, China, and Europe have photographed Apollo landing sites from orbit.
3. High-resolution images of the landing sites. NASAās Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) has imaged:
ā¢ Descent stages of lunar modules
ā¢ Astronaut footpaths
ā¢ Rover tracks
ā¢ Experiment packages left behind
ā¢ These images match mission logs exactly.
4. Consistent telemetry and radio tracking
ā¢ Apollo missions were tracked by multiple independent ground stations worldwide.
ā¢ Radio signals came from the Moon, with measurable signal delay and Doppler shift consistent with lunar distance.
5. Physics matches
ā¢ The motion of dust, shadows, and lighting in lunar footage matches vacuum and low-gravity physics, not studio effects.
ā¢ Alleged āinconsistenciesā (waving flags, no stars, odd shadows) all have well-understood physical explanations.
Your position is literally that thousands of nongovernmental scientists, and thousands of governmental scientists from incredibly adverse nations, and hundreds of non-scientist workers, all collaborated to pull off the biggest live hoax of all time.
Okā¦
Sharkey
Word Ninja
Right, because 2D photos of 3D situations never create a vanishing point for parallel lines or do weird things with shadows, especially with wide angle lenses.
Attachments
jeeeep
Hooked
NPC 6060āø42
Hooked
Ddays
Hooked
Mike Pierson
Hooked
jeeeep
Hooked
Ddays
Hooked
jeeeep
Hooked
Ddays
Hooked
Oh for sure I am. I have serious questions and there are sooo many things that donāt add up. Comments from the astronauts themselves.
Funny thing about normies is their rigid adherence to the narrative
You remember Covid, right?
jeeeep
Hooked
covid and moon landing comparing apples to oranges.
are you referring to Aldrin? where he was referring to broadcasters at the time?
Have you looked at this, are all these images fake?
Images | Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera
Also considering how reflective the moon is, Sibrel showing how light behaves on earth is like listening to a 3-year-old argue, at least the myth busters acknowledge the reflective nature of the moon and demonstrate a plausible answer.
Life is full of wonder, are there things the government or shadow government agencies hide from the public? absolutely, they've gained too much power over the years under the guise of "protection and security".
Funny thing about conspiracists is their rigid adherence to the narrative.
NPC 6060āø42
Hooked
Two weeks to flatten the curve!
OverlanderJK
Resident Smartass
Funny thing about boomers is their rigid adherence to thinking the moon landing was real.covid and moon landing comparing apples to oranges.
are you referring to Aldrin? where he was referring to broadcasters at the time?
Have you looked at this, are all these images fake?
Images | Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera
lroc.im-ldi.com
Also considering how reflective the moon is, Sibrel showing how light behaves on earth is like listening to a 3-year-old argue, at least the myth busters acknowledge the reflective nature of the moon and demonstrate a plausible answer.
Life is full of wonder, are there things the government or shadow government agencies hide from the public? absolutely, they've gained too much power over the years under the guise of "protection and security".
Funny thing about conspiracists is their rigid adherence to the narrative.
Ddays
Hooked
lol Iām perfectly fine being proven incorrect, but I will constantly question the narrative.covid and moon landing comparing apples to oranges.
are you referring to Aldrin? where he was referring to broadcasters at the time?
Have you looked at this, are all these images fake?
Images | Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera
Also considering how reflective the moon is, Sibrel showing how light behaves on earth is like listening to a 3-year-old argue, at least the myth busters acknowledge the reflective nature of the moon and demonstrate a plausible answer.
Life is full of wonder, are there things the government or shadow government agencies hide from the public? absolutely, they've gained too much power over the years under the guise of "protection and security".
Funny thing about conspiracists is their rigid adherence to the narrative.
I didnāt just start looking at these alternatives- itās been an interest since I was like 7 or 8. Saying itās apples and oranges donāt fly - itās all part of the same reality being offered by whatever you want to call the deep state. And yes Iāve seen mounds of supporting and contradictory data and Iāll give up on something if proven wrong. But so far Iām batting well over .750 tho so thereās that
